stason.org logo lotus


previous page: 23  The klingons wouldn't use a human-based system (Objections to the theory)page up: Stardates in Star Trek FAQnext page: 25  The 4 at the beginning of tng stardates means 24th century (Objections to the theory)

24 There aren't really any stardates below 1000 (Objections to the theory)

 Books
 TULARC
















Description

This article is from the Stardates in Star Trek FAQ, by Andrew Main zefram@dcs.warwick.ac.uk with numerous contributions by others.

24 There aren't really any stardates below 1000 (Objections to the theory)

Objection: this system has stardates starting at zero, but there hasn't been
any canonical stardate below 1000.

This is a valid objection. There is really no evidence either way, so it was
decided that stardates would do what it looks like they ought to. The
rationale is that stardates will be handled primarily by computers, and
computers like to start counting at zero. Zero-based counting actually makes
a lot more sense than one-based counting, so now that we have the concept it
makes sense that a new time standard will use it.

 

Continue to:


Share and Enjoy

Bookmark this story so others can enjoy it:
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Wists

Tags

education, books, Star Trek, stardate, time







TOP
previous page: 23  The klingons wouldn't use a human-based system (Objections to the theory)page up: Stardates in Star Trek FAQnext page: 25  The 4 at the beginning of tng stardates means 24th century (Objections to the theory)